poVoq

Look up succulent roofs sometimes and you might change your preconceived and mostly false opinion about green roofs 🤷

Those are cheap, low maintenance and last forever.

I would say we admins are more like the plumbers of this place (and the mods are the janitors), but thanks for the praise.

Our wiki isn’t used that much, but it seems to have a few enthusiastic users so it is worth keeping around, and luckily it doesn’t seem like Dokuwiki is turning into slopware like Etherpad 😑

Yeah the server the reverse-proxy runs on was overwhelmed dealing with AI scraper requests in a strange feedback loop with Anubis. I am almost a bit suspicious if this is intentional to discurage the use of Anubis, but for now these scrapers seem to be fine with ingesting the garbage that Iocaine serves them, so at least temporarily our instance behaves again like expected.

It’s not prejudice if it is objectively true 🤷

Most LLM users don’t try to hide it and the commit pattern is a result of the LLM assisted workflow, thus without losing the perceived benefits of using LLMs it can not be easily hidden. And the pattern isn’t only about when but also what. You might be oblivious to it, but the pattern is very clear and not possible to mistake with regular code writing patterns in an overall project. It is harder to spot in individual smaller PRs though, but that isn’t what Codeberg’s new policy is targeting.

And anyways, this isn’t a question of “wrong-think”, but simply of Codeberg not wanting to be associated with such low quality, likely copyright violating and resource hogging projects. The LLM using people have plenty of other code forges to use, so it is really a non-issue 🤷

No need to assume that. Just by using LLMs to assist with code writing, the human in the loop changes their commit pattern.

Sorry but you are clearly delusional. There is no magic involved, just being able to look at the structure of the code and the pattern of the commits. It’s fairly easy in fact.

Are you trying to make some point? Because, yes they can.

There are plenty of other public git forges you can migrate your LLM assisted projects to 🤷

You might not be able to tell, but the signs something is LLM generated are pretty obvious to more experienced programmers.

Yes, that is what the term “derivative work” referrs to.

Indeed, this ruling says nothing about something being a derivative work, all it says is that AI generated works can not create new copyright claims, which is totally sensible and non-controversial.

Looks like the bad HN commenter takes are leaking 😑

Those comments on HN are hilarious 😅 That site really works as a parody of bad tech bro takes if you ignore that most of them are sadly dead serious.

Window awnings can help a lot in summer and are relatively easy to retrofit on an existing building.

Green roofs can also help significantly.

Apparently not:

We have a no-AI contributions policy. This is because, generally speaking, LLMs generate code that, while may work, is poorly organised and difficult to maintain.

Well, it is a tarpit and not a scaper block like Anubis and I need to think about some additional things to add to it in the future, but it solved the main issue of some scrapers recently causing some sort of reconnection loop on our reverse-proxy which was really slowing down that server and causing connection issues.

https://iocaine.madhouse-project.org/

Seems to be indeed working now 👍