Oh, this has nothing to do with me, just a philosophical question.

If we agree that it’s intelligent, we can ask it.

What are you talking about?

I’m sorry, but you lost me.

Every ‘disruptive’ technology in the past decade as well.

Not really true.

If they stop, it’s over for them.

They have to keep digging hoping for something big to happen: IPO and rake in cash from retirements; big government programs with guaranteed vendor lock-in; or stumbling upon an AGI and winning the ‘’‘’‘’‘race’‘’‘’‘’.

If the market wakes up from the hypertrend before that, they are absolutely fucked.

We get fucked in every scenario, btw.

I have 100% attendance god damnit!

But they can afford a Tesla

It’s a giant money sink for no benefit, nobody can say we don’t have the money.

Because he has to work in the US. In their Overton, he is pretty left. And has been most of what I remember.

Bernie?

How about we stop using LLMs and solve world hunger and housing first? With that money being spent on a dead-end technology, we could have had billion developers instead. Instead we burn the planet for… protecting us from AI impact?

It worked many times before - utterly deranged ideas drowned in borrowed money until it worked, or they just cashed out.

Look no further than LLMs.