Ha, that’s an interesting look on it.

What I got from seeing this thunderous stuborn belief in religion and first and second comings, it that perhaps we are a GMO of apes by some ET species reprogrammed for mining and grabbing (accidentally discovering caffeine and inventing capitalism along the way) some rare resources or for terraforming for a different species for when they come again (this second coming shit I keep hearing about, which seems reason enough to justify the Palestian genocide and now litterally lighting the world on fire).

In either scenario, humans wont be aren’t the beneficiaries.

I’m truly in awe of nature. Gaia as a living being has gotten a virus. And though lots of other species are affected and some have gone or will go extinct because of this, the species that are going to see the biggest % culling of their numbers and those who survive will have to adapt to most of all species is the exact species gaia’s trying to teach a lesson - if not outright get rid of.

Again, you’re right, but the TOS do need to be clear and unambiguous which this is not. This is - like a lot of Lemmy these days- a knee jerk response to a novel technology that’s not fully understood. That’s obvious because of how the rules are worded.

This opens them up to anti discrimination lawsuits - which are take quite serious in German courts. They would have to demonstrate that a user is banned from uploading work because it is “mostly” LLM generated and not because they are trans or black or something.

I know this is unpopular opinion on Lemmy atm, but this genie isn’t going back in the bottle. And it is very difficult to fence against because when used properly as an assisting tool, and not as an oracle of truth or a full self driving vibecoding machine, the code quality is basically indistinguishable from human code.

I’m not saying Codeberg can’t do this, I’m saying they will struggle once there is serious pushback on this and it will hopefully open up the discussions on copyright and their place in modern society. Akin to how guns are still made and used, but the more advanced countries have strict laws around who can purchase them and who can use them and for what purpose.

I agree they are within their right to do it, I’m saying it legally wouldn’t survive a challenge in court the way they implemented it.

No need for your combative tone or assuming I have slop that needs hosting.

It’s more than just the ‘mostly’. In legal proceedings they would really struggle to ‘demonstrate cause’, i.e. what is copyrighted, and what is not - not to mention demonstrating criminal intent.

As I wrote before, these are phase 2 effects of a new emerging technology. All it will take is one company to go after them in court to reverse this.

Let’s not forget that a percentage of the fires is lit by firefighters pyromaniacs too. What’s unavoidable is that the fuels for those fires will be more abundant and at a higher burning temperature than before.