Like anyone who’s offended by this isn’t already slopping for Microsoft’s GitHub.
grrgyle
Class: He/him/they.
Alignment: Hopeful loser.
Aesthetic: WIP, horror vacui / amor copia.
🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧
🚧 UNDER CONSTRUCTION🚧
🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧🚧
- 0 posts
- 9 comments
I use them as one of my mirrors for public projects, but host my own repos and CI now.
As in obvious. Like they have model instructions and bots credited as authors on commits.
Something extruded from an LLM?
- 3 days
I just peeked at your instance and it doesn’t look that different to me. 👀 of course that was just a casual glance
- 3 days
My experience is, I try the frontends out every month or so but always go back to plain (browser, on mobile and desktop) because some feature is missing or off
I like how they look though! And am frontend curious — just haven’t seen one I like more then default web experience yet
- 7 days
While I’m not a very community focused person, finally grokking that everyone I see around where I live are real people that I’m in community with, has changed not just how I think of them but how I treat them.
Especially people I might not agree with, or my addict or unhoused neighbours. It’s pretty cool how just being genuine and open with people will change in turn their entire demeanor towards you.





The rule is for vibe coded projects. From the article:
They don’t need a rule that can be run automatically because it’s a purely human operation that is trying to take a stand against the more pernicious effects of corporate LLMs.
Do you just disagree with this stance and are just trying to poke whatever hypothetical holes you can in their logic, or do you just want more rigorous definitions/rules?
From experience, content moderation works best when there is some flexibility in the rules, so people can talk it out and come to concessions together.