• 5 posts
  • 14 comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: August 25th, 2025
  • Looking at the top 3 exports of China (by a wide margin before anything else):

    Electrical, electronic equipment $1016.58B
    Machinery, nuclear reactors, boilers $603.82B
    Vehicles other than railway, tramway $248.31B

    That’s all high price stuff.

    Combined with its huge trade surplus, this is a classical “Buy cheap resources - sell expensive highly processed commodities back” scheme, the same as e.g. the uprising European industrializing nations employed as a strategy during their colony exploiting times (and to some degree still do in a similar fashion as China).

    No, there is nothing equal here.

  • China isn’t exploiting anyone.

    Total Imports 2025 EU / China:

    Mineral fuels, oils, distillation products $467.75B / $442.95B
    Plastics $68.38B / $56.48B
    Pearls, precious stones, metals, coins $56.12B / $118.02B
    Articles of apparel, knit or crocheted $53.13B / $3.74B
    Articles of apparel, not knit or crocheted $48.56B / $5.79B
    Iron and steel $44.08B / $30.86B
    Edible fruits, nuts, peel of citrus fruit, melons $31.17B / $20.69B
    Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, aquatics invertebrates $29.23B / $19.93B
    Rubbers $26.46B / $20.57B
    Footwear, gaiters and the like $26.30B / $5.70B
    Copper $18.63B / $74.63B
    Oil seed, oleagic fruits, grain, seed, fruits $18.63B / $57.02B
    Pulp of wood, fibrous cellulosic material, waste $11.87B / $21.98B

    So, looking at the absolute numbers, China is eploiting the world’s resources in a similar fashion as the old style European Union, so I have to disagree.

    I won’t comment on the content of your provided reports and youtube videos (of which at least two look a little… juicy… at first glance), as me just providing you with a bunch of counter-reports and videos, whose reliability you would question in a similar way as I am questioning yours, won’t change anything.

  • That’s why I wrote “if done right”.
    A truly social market economy also has to make sure that workers along the whole supply chain have to get similar rights and treatment as local workers.

    Besides that, centrally planned economies (being the opposite to plain free market capitalism), also don’t really shy away from exploiting the resources of poorer countries.
    (Looking e.g. at imperialistic China here).

I just stumbled upon an article on a German IT news website mentioning that you have to pay to be able to set (a still very limited number of) hyperlinks in your posts.

But I couldn’t find any other sources mention it, except some dated articles referring field testing of such a restriction on Facebook.

Has anyone some info on this or even firsthand experience as a Facebook or Instagram user?

Ich war lange Zeit überzeugt, dass solche Aktionen nicht hilfreich sind, weil sie eventuelle Opfer-Narrative verstärken könnte.

Inzwischen bin ich aber eher der Meinung, dass es eine gute Idee ist, den AfD-Symphatisanten zu zeigen, dass die Meinungen in der realen Welt sich doch noch von denen in ihrer Bubble unterscheiden und das sie nicht für ein Rest-“Volk” sprechen, das still auf ihrer Seite ist.

Da ist so ein Statement in der realen Welt, wie ich es eben entdeckt habe, ein guter Ansatz.