The Trump administration has again acknowledged in court documents that it terminated $7.6 billion in grants for hundreds of clean energy projects “based solely on the political identity of the grant recipient’s state,” in this case, 16 states that voted for Democrat Kamala Harris in the 2024 presid
  • Optional@lemmy.world
    10 days

    WE KNOW

    Thanks for the journalism AP. Knockin it outta the park there.

    • budget_biochemist@slrpnk.netEnglish
      10 days

      We know they did, but it’s legally significant that they just openly admitted they cancelled grants for partisan politics.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        10 days

        Yes but it’s also “safe” for AP to report it. It’s old news effectively.

      • HubertManne@piefed.socialEnglish
        10 days

        yeah we know he is full of bt but for them to admit they are full of bt is significant.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      10 days

      Also also known as an open admission of capricious and prejudicial policy, which is actually a legal slam dunk for getting a court to grant an injunction against the regime’s policy changes on that entire topic.

      • NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net
        10 days

        Unless it gets appealed to the Supreme Court, in which case basically everything done by Trump is fine.