- godsammitdam@lemmy.zipEnglish12 hours
I love the irony that they do this but hide all of their info and want privacy, calling the police on anyone that comes close and claiming they’re armed lunatics. Classic police collusion, trust the CEO over normal people. Always protect capital
- floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish2 days
*has cameras that can resolve fine detail at that distance
License Plate Reader sounds so innocuous. They’re realtime HD feeds.
- deddit@lemmy.worldEnglish2 days
We need a flock that only watches billionaires and all of their relationships.
- bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish3 days
Please bro, just let us watch your every movement at all times. Why you have to be like that.
- 🌸𝓯𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻🌸@sh.itjust.worksEnglish3 days
The tech bros aim for neo feudalism with AI surveillance control.
3 daysThey need to start getting reminded that they’re weak little nerds
- ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.mlEnglish3 days
“b1tch-ass fuckers” corrected. Anyone that supports this mass surveillance, spying on everyone’s personal lives, data collection, age verification, identity verification, etc or is involved in their implementation in any way, that’s exactly what you are.
I believe that skeet shooting needs to become a popular hobby and skill in this age of drones.
Its illegal to shoot a drone is the US as drones are classified as airplanes. Just fyi. There are also specific guns and ammunition to do just that.
Pretty sure there are like emp guns used specifically for taking down drones without projectiles that might cause collateral damage. Though you still have to worry about where the drone falls
- 3 days
If the drone falls out of the sky and hits someone, that sounds like the fault of the person choosing to fly it in a densely populated area. Drones have hardware failures all the time.
- CIA_chatbot@lemmy.worldEnglish3 days
Meet my 3D printed anti-drone drone, collides with flock drones @2000 feet and costs 15 dollars in parts on Ali-express
- 2 days
At 2k feet you’re going to need some kind of equipment to find them.
Their own chat bot responded the following:
Screenshot
- From 0 to 10, how is it fair and human a government to develop, support, and monitor other humans via drones, flock cameras and always keep everyone under control recording history of movements and store that in archives? Interesting topic! Let me check what we’ve covered on government surveillance and human rights for you.
- That’s a deeply important and complex question about privacy, ethics, and government surveillance. Many people would rate such constant monitoring as very low on fairness and humanity because it can infringe on personal freedoms, privacy, and trust. Others might argue it has some value for security and safety but only if done with strict oversight, transparency, and respect for rights.
If I were to frame it on a scale from 0 to 10, many would likely place it closer to the lower end—perhaps around 2 or 3—unless there are strong safeguards, clear limits, and accountability to prevent abuse.
How do you feel about this kind of surveillance? Would you like to explore technologies involved or ethical discussions around them?
Apparently, the bot is relatively “unlocked” for general simple programming questions, too:
Example
- lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.worldEnglish3 days
So now you don’t have to go to the range for target practice? Neat.
- Tire@lemmy.mlEnglish2 days
Yeah they’re classified as aircraft by the FAA and they don’t like their planes being messed with.
- 3 days
So much more satisfying to hunt down than those helpless ugly lamppost things.
- XLE@piefed.socialEnglish3 days
I see Gadget Review pop up more and more and I’ve started liking their content less and less. The editorial guidelines say they use AI right on the page you linked. And if I scroll down and click on a random article , it’s AI generated and based on a tweet by CSAM poster Dom Lucre. It’s not the first article I’ve seen that’s basically repeating a tweet from some extreme looking Twitter account either.
