Meta touts safety features – but for women, the dangers of these recording devices are obvious
  • Abyssian@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2 days

    Because they have no personal morals and will do anything for money. Was that hard to figure out, or just an easy way to write a clickbait headline?

  • Swordgeek@lemmy.caEnglish
    5 days

    Celebrities live in a world totally divorced from reality, humanity, or consequences.

    This is always the answer.

  • mavu@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
    5 days

    because they get paid…?

    Is it hard to understand for some people that “influencer” is a job title that actually hides very little of the day to day business they do.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zipEnglish
      4 days

      We already had a word for them: “shill.”

      “Vapid greedhead” would also work.

    • MangoCats@feddit.itEnglish
      5 days

      What I want to know is: if you’ve got a product that has been market tested and proven for a decade to be creepy, why do you pick a celebrity with a creepy dad to promote it? Are they just trying to own that sliver of market share that doesn’t care?

    • sem@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      5 days

      They have already sold out by definition so their fans won’t care if they attach their name to capitalist surveillance tech.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nzEnglish
    5 days

    Is it really that hard to see why people like Kylie Jenner would like this tech? Taking videos from your exact POV is appealing. They dont think or care about the privacy aspects and are likely already completely brought into a world of Meta/google/apple tendrils in every part of their life.