No, you made a large assumption that this holds up in court completely, predicated on the idea that anything but would be disastorus.

I don’t buy that premise, and neither does codeberg. So again, why should they put money up in that assumption?

So then why are you asking other people to on your behalf?

Wrong thread buddy.

https://vger.to/lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/27242079

That’s how you started this one.

There is a good chance that LLMs are sufficiently transformative that courts will decide they don’t infringe the copyright of their sources.

How much money are you willing to put in to test that?

What’s stopping you from doing it yourself? Be the change you want to see.

Not the person your arguing with.

But what sarcastic comment? You entrrd this thread with a long winded winge.

Sorry typo. They’re not for profit.

Which is not what both github and gitlab are trying to be.

Why should they spend money hosting content the people who are dontating don’t want?

Whats stopping you from taking the software to host codrberg, and host your own?

Because its not the license. That’s software, not a service provider.

Who says they’re trying?

They’re a not for profit…