Heads up, if you use home assistant, any credentials in your config have been hoovered up without your knowledge
StarkZarn
- 2 posts
- 9 comments
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•End-to-End Encrypted Chat that YOU Control: Hosting XMPP (Jabber) with ProsodybyStarkZarn@infosec.pubEnglish
1 yearAgreed, prosody is great! I’ve been doing some experimenting with ejabberd and it seems more enterprise-ready, but I haven’t found anything that is discernable as far as feature advantages.
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•End-to-End Encrypted Chat that YOU Control: Hosting XMPP (Jabber) with ProsodybyStarkZarn@infosec.pubEnglish
1 yearUPDATE: For anyone who comes back to this, or any new readers – I have added a MUC (chat room) on my XMPP server for discussion of any tech-related things, akin to the subject-matter of this blog. Hope to see you there!
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•End-to-End Encrypted Chat that YOU Control: Hosting XMPP (Jabber) with ProsodybyStarkZarn@infosec.pubEnglish
1 yearI have experimented with Simplex, but it feels less tuned toward hosting federated infrastructure and more tuned toward participation with the greater network in a pseudo-anonymous fashion.
Adoption is also always a hurdle with any ecosystem like this, and XMPP is certainly ahead of Simplex in that avenue.
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•End-to-End Encrypted Chat that YOU Control: Hosting XMPP (Jabber) with ProsodybyStarkZarn@infosec.pubEnglish
1 yearIt has a long healthy life ahead! Come join the party, the proof is in the pudding.
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•End-to-End Encrypted Chat that YOU Control: Hosting XMPP (Jabber) with ProsodybyStarkZarn@infosec.pubEnglish
1 yearYeah they just redid their container image pipeline and these containers are the result!
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•End-to-End Encrypted Chat that YOU Control: Hosting XMPP (Jabber) with ProsodybyStarkZarn@infosec.pubEnglish
1 yearSuper true. I think this was best exemplified by SignalGate
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•End-to-End Encrypted Chat that YOU Control: Hosting XMPP (Jabber) with ProsodybyStarkZarn@infosec.pubEnglish
1 yearThis is great, I have not seen this post before. Thank you for sharing.
You make an excellent point here, that the burden of security and privacy is put on the user, and that means that the other party in which you’re engaged in conversation with can mess it up for the both of you. It’s far from perfect, absolutely. Ideally you can educate those that are willing to chat with you on XMPP and kill two birds with one stone, good E2EE, and security and privacy training for a friend. XMPP doesn’t tick the same box as Signal though, certainly. I still rely heavily on Signal, but that data resides on and transits a lot of things that I don’t control. There’s a time and a place for concerns with both, but I wanted to share my strategy for an internal chat server that also meets some of those privacy and security wickets.
Take control of your data, join the tech chat. Host an XMPP server and leverage end-to-end encryption for your personal data
This is absolutely not what DNSSEC is. DNSSEC provides authenticity of the response, not privacy. You’re describing a means of encrypted name resolution, like dns-over-tls, dns-over-https, etc.



They have been hoovered up, by home assistant. I made no claim, nor did the source, that clear-text credentials were shipped anywhere.
This is meant to drive awareness on a transparency and dev issue, not an overt compromise. My language was maybe a bit too inflammatory though, I suppose.