Wildmimic

• There are common techniques that can be used broadly to get results with LLMs.
• Some source code is floating around out there, like it is mentioned in the article.
• Yes, decompilation techniques are something that cannot be prevented and are sped up by LLMs.
• There are only so many devs patching bugs, while there might be millions trying to break in - they mentioned the chaining of multiple “low”-priority bugs to escalate the severity, and if you need months to even get the really dangerous stuff fixed, it’s a free-for-all bonanza as soon as those models hit the public, and these people don’t even need to know anything about cybersecurity - Joe Shmoe can tell Mythos to “go hack Onedrive” and that’s all that is needed from Joe Shmoe.

The slot that is currently in use is the slower one since it’s only Type: x1. Depending on what you use the slot currently (such as an M.2 drive), you might wanna switch slots so you can take advantage of the speed; the x1 slot is completely adequate for 1gbps ethernet if you don’t need more. Both slots are otherwise functionally the same, but make sure to look up in your mainboard documentation if there’s any limitation if you use both slots or a specific hardware configuration (mine deactivated the second M.2 slot after changing from an 2600x to an 5950x for example)

Well, it might help with the behavioral issues which are attached to male puberty, maybe reducing bullying and sexual harassment. It could also be used to teach about female anatomy, a thematic complex that seems to be sorely lacking in the US in general.

Ok, end of sarcasm. Simply putting this thing there as a bad substitute for a real teacher is not even a bad joke. It is insulting towards both the students which deserve to be taught by someone they can relate to and who is invested in their growth, and it is insulting towards teachers by showing them that they are seen as nothing more than information dispensers.

Teaching is so much more; the most important lessons i learned in school weren’t the information i was getting or the stuff i was asked on tests, but the continued impulses to make sure i think for myself, to be critical towards my surroundings, to make sure i don’t just accept incoming information, but also making sure to see who is feeding me that information and WHY i get this information fed at all.

It was an inoculation against bad actors and propaganda. I know i am still not immune to it (noone is), but i often just realize why a specific piece was written, being able to read between the lines, without much effort. This is what is needed for a functioning democracy, and it is obvious that exactly this ability is under attack from all sides.

That thing would get vandalized, hacked and flashed back to a sexbot firmware in no time. Funnily enough, the improved fleshlights these things normally have can be bought standalone, so maybe even a hardware upgrade would have been in that abominations future.

Anything but regulate guns, making mental health ressources more accessible or punish bullying.

This normalizes policing by machines, controlled by faceless people who will be shielded against consequences just like cops are shielded now. Drones don’t have a face, a name or an personell number. If something happens (and it will), you can’t even point your finger on the guilty party anymore. It also shields those controllers from any social backlash they would get if they would hurt someone in person.

The banks wouldn’t give them the credit needed without this. This is one of the signs of the bubble crumbling. The question isn’t if the card house collapses, but when. We’re all waiting for it. Currently the can still cover for each other, but that strategy only goes so far.

Let them all congregate in their New Zealand bunkers and then nuke the shit out of them. New Zealands sacrifice would be appreciated.

My Linux does not do this shit. get rekt MS and LG.

The periodic penalty comes into play if Google does not change the crap they were sentenced for. Ultimately, what the EU wants is that Google plays by the rules.

Yeah, Defnulls comment is pretty sensible and matches a platform like codeberg a lot more than a blanket ban for anything crypto related, even when it’s not intended for crap like a rug pull or smth. I am pretty sure they will clarify the rules asap, because the current way to phrase it doesn’t seem to match what they really wanted to do.

I don’t know, ask them. In the referred thread in the end it says:

We would also like to refer to the comment by @defnull concerning the interpretation of this amendment.

Defnulls comment says:

Context is important. The rule is: “Content that harms the reputation of Codeberg, such as cryptocurrency related projects” and it’s a part of the “You must not share any content that’s expressing hate or encouraging violence towards a person or group for any reason.” rule.
If a project does not harm the reputation of Codeberg (e.g. by scamming people or doing other shady stuff) it does not fall under this specific rule. And if it did, it would be a TOS violation even before the change. Cryptocurrency (the scammy kind) was just added as an example here.
With a lot of creativity and a complete lack of trust in Codeberg you could read this backwards as “All remotely cryptocurrency related projects harm Codebergs reputation, so they must be banned” , but that’s not what this rule actually says.
Another common argument is that this rule could be abused to attack or harm ‘good’ projects. We all know how a bad laws (e.g. copyright) can be used as a weapon of suppression. For big platform, it’s way easier and also more safe to quickly act on complaints instead of investigating. Users are guilty by default and must prove they are not. Vague rules are very dangerous under those circumstances. The Codeberg TOS situation is fundamentally different though: > No one has any ‘right’ to get AI or crypto projects removed from Codeberg. Trolls cannot file false claims en masse and demand action to get someone else in trouble. If they do, then Codeberg mods can quickly dismiss those false claims, they do not have to disprove them. Banning a project is way more work than not banning it, so there will be no ‘purge’ and no mass-banning. No one has time for that. We just need to get rid of the worst and most obvious offenders, that’s all. Humans with brains will decide on a per-project basis.

The rule is: “Content that harms the reputation of Codeberg, such as cryptocurrency related projects”

The interpretation that all crypto projects are banned is false, if you read the complete thread. The important part here is “Content that harms the reputation of Codeberg”. This was confirmed by a codeberg official.

https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1254#issuecomment-19923979
and the 2 comments below.

I had to replace my DS because the hinge broke, which was pretty common back then. I scored myself a used one from the revision a few years back, where they made the hinges more robust.

the only console outside of my Steam Deck that i still occasionally use is my old Nintendo DS, because of it’s small form factor and my seemingly undying M3 card lol

The real threat is what happens when Alphabet doesn’t comply with the ruling. This is a warning shot to make them behave.

Google is required to comply with the Commission’s decisions within 60 days, otherwise it risks periodic penalty payments of up to 5% of its total worldwide turnover.

Ladybird is slowly becoming useable the last time i looked, so there is some movement out there, but it’s slow and the future of the open web browser and the open web itself is currently very uncertain.

I have to disagree. Easing access is the thing that is needed to ensure that Open Source AI isn’t pushed to the fringes of society.

Even Browser addons are a hurdle for the common user. You are speaking from the perspective of someone who knows how to do things.

Making sure everyone regardless of technical aptitude can use OS AI is the only thing guaranteeing that closed source apps that simplify access don’t take over everything.

Although this would also enable the alternate scenario of reducing incoming sunlight simply by turning them around. This project both doesn’t think far enough and much too far at the same time.

Also, we would need to finally abolish borders and create a world government for effective usage of such systems; this would enable the designation of areas where supercharged amounts of solar power are collected 24/7, while reducing solar input to areas experiencing heat waves.

Well, that article really made me consider getting a dedicated music device again after decades of using my smartphone.

That would be the ideal case. - making sure that the obligations that come with providing living space are always equivalent to the rent, while mandating to operate efficiently.

Which actually is simply a non-profit. Prohibit renting out apartments and houses if you aren’t one.

(those bastards at blackstone would shit themselves when confronted with such legislation)