Shouldn’t the so-called smart technology pick up on the fact that you are driving full speed into a house? Is that not an easy error to avoid?
- Grimy@lemmy.worldEnglish11 days
With how all cars are connected these days, we could easily throttle them using GPS data depending on the road you’re on. I don’t really get why cars can even go so fast in general, max should be twenty over the highway limit.
Nobody really wants that though I’m guessing.
- Blaster M@lemmy.worldEnglish10 days
When you car slams on the brakes suddenly because it thinks you’re suddenly driving on the jog road next to the highway, don’t complain to me.
- Grimy@lemmy.worldEnglish10 days
The same applies to stopping it from driving full speed into a house. Hence why I said most don’t want that. Some clear drawbacks.
That being said, putting a max speed that is only a bit above highway speed is an easy win imo.
- ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish10 days
Slamming the brakes on the highway because either map data is incorrect, it misread a sign, or GNSS is misplacing the car is not a drawback, it’s a massive fucking safety hazard.
- ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish10 days
No a drawback would be a minor nuisance. You can live with a drawback. That would not be a minor nuisance and definitely not something you could live with.
- Blaster M@lemmy.worldEnglish10 days
It’s a skill issue on the driver’s part… or do you want the Tesla to come to a screeching halt on the highway every time the cameras white out from the sun?
- SirActionSack@aussie.zoneEnglish10 days
I want vehicles that rely on cameras for detecting obstacles to be banned.
Anything that uses reasonable object detection methods should be banned if it lets you drive into a house. My Kia won’t let me drive into a house.
- GoatSynagogue@lemmy.worldEnglish9 days
You may as well say you want people banned from driving then. We use “cameras” for object detection.